Blog is short for Web Log and is a publicly accessible online journal as it offers a time sequenced journal that date entry (CQUniversity, 2009). In this assessment, professional blog, I will be investigating and learning a wide variety of Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) or, as they are also known in the business world, e-learning technology. Based on my assessment of the technologies I will contain an analysis according to the active learning, ICT learning design, learning styles frameworks and other frameworks. In addition I will discuss how these technology lead to higher order and creative thinking/learning. I also will indicate which technologies I would use as a Learning Manager (LM) and how I would use them to enhance student learning plus make my teaching more efficient and effective in the learning environment – in and out of class time. Whilst incorporating technology into the learning environment the LM needs to take into consideration some key points: netiquette, Internet safety, access and equity and whether the technology easily adaptable for digital immigrants, I will be explaining all this below in more detail. I will also endeavour to include thoughtful comments on my peers’ blogs and responding to those placed on my Blog. In summary this assessment will result in a professional blog, on the technologies LM/or myself can utilise in their/my student learning environment to enhance student learning and make their/my teaching more efficient.
HIGHER ORDER THINKING
Perkins from Howard University (cited in Ginger Champagne Varnado Elementary School, n.d.) claims higher order thinking,
Every day thinking, like ordinary walking, is a natural performance we all pick
up. But good thinking, like running the l00-yard dash, is a technical
performance ... Sprinters have to be taught how to run the 100-yard dash; good
thinking is the result of good teaching, which includes much practice.
Higher-order thinking requires students to manipulate information and ideas in ways that transform their meaning and implications (The State of Queensland Department of Education and Training, 2004). LM can engage students in higher order thinking learning experience and or environment by:
- allowing students to work collaboratively or in cooperative learning groups, to enhance communicating with others in varied ways
- asking open-ended questions with more than one “right answer”
- providing activities that accommodate multiple learning styles
- developing problem solving activities that require different types of thinking (Montgomery Country Public School, 2005).
CREATIVE THINKING
Vonado Elementary School (n.d.) describes creative thinking as a “divergent thinking. It generates something new or different. It involves having a different idea that works as well or better than previous ideas.” Anne de A’Echevarria's (cited in Teaching Expertise, n.d.) focus is on QCA Personal Learning and Thinking Skills framework – this is to encourage creative thinkers across the curriculum. She did a questionnaire and interview question on students and found their ideas on creative thinking (Teaching Expertise). One student (cited in Teaching Expertise) explain creative thinking as, “Even learning French verbs could be creative if you used puppets or something. If you were allowed to put something of yourself into it”. Another student (cited in Teaching Expertise) explains it as, “It could be an idea that you’re trying to work on to make it better, or sometimes just putting things into your own words.” To conclude, the students were asked to give recommendation about what their teachers could do help them become more creative (Teaching Expertise). The enquiry group partly based their development work on these ideas:
- collaboration/sharing ideas helps
- give us more open tasks: ‘don’t tell us exactly what to do’
- give us ‘free’ time during the day to be creative; to ‘express ourselves’
- give us more choice
- give us confidence; help us ‘do things for ourselves’
- be aware that creativity comes from the heart, sometimes slowly and never in 30 minutes!
- give us ‘space to put ourselves into it’
- don’t give us too much help
- there shouldn’t be a ‘right and a wrong answer’ (Teaching Expertise, n.d.).
Higher order and creative thinking will be fostered in the learning environment for the technology below and will explain by means of frameworks such as active learning, ICT learning design, learning styles frameworks and other frameworks. Hence how I will engage my students and have an effective learning environment.
FACTORS THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATIONS WHEN TEACHING WITH ICT
The factors LM and students need to take into consider when utilising the below technology are:
- netiquette
- internet safety
- access and equity
- whether the technology easily adaptable for digital immigrants.
NETIQUETTE
The term “netiquette” is derived from the two words Internet and etiquette. Netiquette principally means any communication a person may send out or receive from the Net and expresses the rules for online behaviour. Examples of netiquette include:
- not typing in capitals (LIKE THIS) as it is seen as shouting
- not sending bulk email or spam
- not defaming people online
- responding appropriately to requests
- using Internet acronyms (Internet acronyms are acronyms which are used specifically on the Internet or mobile phones as a method of communication) or emoticons (emoticons are a combination of keystrokes which form a picture relating to a feeling) (Albury Local Internet, 1996; Australia Government NetAlert, 2007).
INTERNET SAFETY
The internet provides a powerful source for learning and research skills for LM and students, for example, improved access to subject learning across a wide range of learning areas, integrated or cross-curricular studies etc.; however, with this power come risks and Internet safety is of the utmost concern (CQUniversity, 2009).
Some of the risks fall under the headings of:
- exposure to inappropriate material – pornographic, sexually explicit, hatful, violent
- physical danger – stranger danger (meeting someone online who may claim to be someone else)
- harassment and bullying – cyber bulling (bullying though a Internet service, for example, email, chat rooms, discussion groups or Web pages. May also include bullying though mobile phone
- privacy – supplying personal information online can result in receiving spam (advertising material and/or viruses) (CQUninveristy, 2009).
However with the above in mind in the learning environment the majority of this can be minimised via the Walled Garden approach or by being aware of the guideline and advice in NetAlert. The link for NetAlert is http://www.netalert.gov.au/. Answer.com (2007) refers to Walled Garden “a network or service that either restricts or makes it difficult for users to obtain applications or content from external sources.” Through employing Walled Garden approach students, teachers, librarians and alike have a highly restricted access to the world online, for example, in Australia public schools they have only have access to government approved Web sites (CQUniversity, 2009), therefore limiting their accessibly to social networking and teachers and library staff to sites they might find useful to teach via. Hence I think the best way to implant Internet safety is like the private schools do (CQUniversity). I would read the NetAltert and brief the students on the rules, regulations, correct method of use via Internet, hence making sure Internet safety is never breached by students , if so follow the correct provided under behavioural management. This provide the teacher, librarians and alike an enormous advantage in terms of engaging their students. In addition this will also teach and encourage students the correct manner when utilising the Internet when Walled Garden approach is not in place, for example, in the learning environment outside the classroom.
ACCESS AND EQUITY
Using the technology I am going to cover below the LM needs to keep in mind access and equity, not all students have the access to computers outside the learning environment. These groups can include:
- cultural and linguistic diversity
- gender
- indigenous students
- students with disability (CQUniversity, 2009).
Hence these students who fall in the above category, LM needs to be aware of this and teach students how to understand and gain control of the e-learning technology that are embedded in them.
DIGITAL NATIVES OR DIGITAL IMMIGRANTS
According to Prensky (2001), learners can be categorised as digital natives or digital immigrants. Prensky quotes digital natives, “Our students today are all “native speaker” of the digital language of computers, video games and the Internet”. They spend their entire lives immersed and driven by these forms of technology; to them it is an integral part of their lives: computers, videogames, digital music players, video cams, cell phones, and all the other toys and tools of the digital age (Prensky). Hence not a day, maybe not a minute or a second goes by where these digital natives are not utilising digital age tools. Whereas digital immigrants, Prensky quotes, are “speak an outdated language (that of the pre-digital age), are struggling to teach a population that speaks an entirely new language”.
Therefore as LM what better way to engage students by incorporating their everyday technology into the learning environment; however, most LM are digital immigrants therefore reading on will enlighten them on how to use these update technology in a digital natives world. In Pernskey’s (2005) article “Engage Me or Enrage Me” quotes, “So hi there, I’m the tuned-out kid in the back row with the headphones. Are you going to engage me today or enrage me? The choice is yours”. LMs should speak to this student and other like them by engaging them with the digital age tools, so read and find out how. However when implanting these tools into the learning environment the LM needs to keep in mind the above mention for example: Netiquette, Internet safety and access and equity.